Covid-19: gastroenterology perspectives

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/021

Covid-19: gastroenterology perspectives

  • Natassia Vianna Bocchese 1
  • Noele Gurgel Dávila 1
  • Maria Beatriz Maia Rodrigues 1
  • Rebecca Renata Lapenda do Monte 1
  • Renata Carneiro Melo 1
  • Amália Cinthia Meneses Rêgo 2
  • Irami Araújo-Filho 3*

1 Undergraduate Student of Medicine at UnP - Potiguar University - Laureate International Universities – Natal/Brazil; 
2 Postgraduate Program in Biotechnology at Potiguar University / UnP - Laureate International Universities. Teaching and Research Manager - School of Health - League against Cancer Natal - RN / Brazil. Ph.D. in Health Science; 
3 Postgraduate Program in Biotechnology at Potiguar University/ UnP-Laureate nternational Universities; Full Professor Department of Surgery, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte. Full Professor, Department of Surgery, Potiguar University. Ph.D in Health Science/ Natal-RN, Brazil.

*Corresponding Author: Irami Araújo-Neto, Undergraduate Student of Medicine at UnP - Potiguar University - Laureate International Universities – Natal/Brazil.

Citation: Natassia Vianna Bocchese, Noele Gurgel Dávila, Maria Beatriz Maia Rodrigues, Irami Araújo-Neto, Mariana de Oliveira Costa, Diniz de Meiroz Grillo Barbalho, Amália Cinthia Meneses Rêgo, Irami Araújo-Filho. (2020) Covid-19: gastroenterology perspectives Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. 2(3); DOI: 10.31579/2690-8794/021

Copyright: © 2020 Irami Araújo-Neto, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Received: 26 May 2020 | Accepted: 15 June 2020 | Published: 22 June 2020

Keywords: covid-19, covid-19 virus disease, sars-cov-2 infection, signs and symptoms - digestive, gastrointestinal tract, digestive system

Abstract

The clinical syndrome caused by SARS-CoV-2 was called COVID-19 and became a pandemic from March 2020. Fever, dry cough, and dyspnoea are the predominant clinical manifestations of the disease. However, symptoms such as diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal discomfort can also be found in infected patients. Despite the increased prevalence since the second phase of the recent epidemic in China, scientific evidence on the gastrointestinal manifestations of COVID-19 has received little attention. This study aimed to report gastrointestinal signs and pathological findings in patients with COVID-19, in addition to discussing the possibility of fecal transmission. SARS-CoV-2 penetrates gastrointestinal epithelial cells, making patients' feces potentially infectious. Although viral RNA can be detected in feces, it is not clear whether fecal-oral transmission occurs. The gastrointestinal characteristics and abdominal manifestations of COVID-19 were reviewed based on case reports and retrospective clinical studies related to the digestive system. It is essential to know that, as the pandemic spreads, new studies are published, and knowledge about gastrointestinal symptoms is better known and reported.

Introduction

The SARS-CoV-2 virus, the causative agent of COVID-19, has been detected in more than 166 countries worldwide. The disease began in China in 2019. Due to its rapid spread, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 as a pandemic. This situation has affected several countries and has become a threat to public health and a socioeconomic challenge [1–5].

Coronaviruses belong to a family of single-stranded RNA viruses, which are subdivided into four main genera. The taxonomy of SARS-CoV-2 is 82% similar to that of the SARS-CoV-1 coronavirus, and both belong to the β genus. The clinical manifestations of these diseases are similar and involve the respiratory and digestive systems [6–9].

Although the symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 are milder, infectivity is higher compared to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, becoming a health threat. Generally, the clinical syndrome of COVID-19 is associated with fever, dry cough, and dyspnoea. However, atypical symptoms such as weakness, myalgia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and neurological conditions are described in some patients. Gastrointestinal symptoms, although rare, it is possible and harder to recognize as part of the usual syndrome [1,7,8,10,11].

In addition to the usual clinical picture, there is the possibility that infected patients may be asymptomatic, with a more aggressive late-onset spectrum of disease, severe acute respiratory failure, and multiple organ failure, due to increased inflammatory cytokines. These changes increase the morbidity and mortality of the disease [1,2,8,10].

It was observed that during the initial stage of the epidemic, the proportion of patients with diarrhea and other digestive symptoms reported both in Wuhan and in different regions was around 2% -10%. However, in the late phase of the epidemic, the number of these patients increased significantly [1].

To better understand the involvement of the gastrointestinal system, the present study analyzed published clinical cases with reports of digestive manifestations and pathological findings of patients with COVID-19 to provide references for prevention and control, diagnosis, and treatment of this new pathology when its clinical presentation differs from the usual.

Methods

The research was carried out in the databases Pubmed, Scopus, Scielo, Embase, Web of Science, in addition to searching Google Scholar, considered as a source of gray literature, as it does not contain peer-reviewed articles. The articles were selected according to the focus of the study: manifestations of the gastrointestinal and abdominal tracts of COVID-19, in addition to research of the fecal-oral transmission. The studies were chosen by combining the following keywords: COVID-19, COVID-19 virus disease, SARS-CoV-2 infection, Signs, and Symptoms - Digestive, Gastrointestinal Tract, Digestive System. All relevant studies published in the 2019-2020 period were included in the cohort, systematic review, case-control, cross-sectional, case series, review and editorial studies. The filters chosen were studies carried out in humans, complete and published from January 2019 to the present, totaling thirty articles. The analysis, review, and selection of materials was carried out in pairs, separately, based on the reading of the title and summary of the study, with a third reviewer in case of disagreement between the other two reviewers.

Results and Discussion

Based on the similarity with the other viruses of the coronavirus family, some studies question the possibility of fecal-oral transmission of SARS-CoV-2, in addition to transfer by droplets, aerosols, and direct contact. The data are emphatic when they state that the SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV-2 viruses are viable in contaminated water and feces, being considered potential means of transmission [7].

Years ago, the RNA of these viruses was isolated in the sewage of a hospital in Beijing that treated patients with SARS, and another study was carried out, ratifying the growth of SARS-CoV-1 in the sewage water. Other hospitals through these studies, it was also proven that the viruses remain highly infectious for 14 days, being able to withstand temperatures of up to 4ºC. 

However, despite the structural similarity of these viruses with SARS-CoV-2, there is still a consensus on the resistance and variability. Yet, it is known that fecal samples remain positive for 11.2 days, on average, after clearance of respiratory tract samples [7,12]

According to Yeo et al., the viability of SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV is proven in conditions of low temperatures and humidity, as well as the continued presence of these agents in the environment, corroborating their transmissibility by contact contaminated fomites. Thus, it was observed that these viruses present tropism for the cells of the gastrointestinal tract, and their presence remains viable in the patients' feces, even after hospital discharge. These findings provide us with explanations about the occurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms, the recurrence in patients considered cured, and the transmission in close contacts [7,13].

In any case, the fecal-oral transmission is more common in rural regions where there is no primary sanitation network and adequate sanitary facilities. Besides, the population lacks awareness of the need for hand hygiene, as well as the habit of drinking contaminated water and food [14].

The epidemiological profile of patients affected by COVID-19 varies according to the population studied. Still, middle-aged women, smokers, and patients with heart disease, diabetes, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are more affected in general. In addition to typical respiratory symptoms, about 19% of these patients had at least one gastrointestinal manifestation at some point, with diarrhea being the most common [14,15].

Enteric disease with mild and nonspecific characteristics, when not associated with respiratory impairment, was neglected and underestimated during the first clinical investigations of COVID-19, corroborating the critical state that the pandemic is today [15,16]. 

Therefore, health professionals should identify these patients early and warn them about the possible risk of infection after confirmation through the oropharyngeal swab [13].

In patients with pre-existing digestive diseases, clinical outcomes are often more reserved. In a political analysis in China involving 1590 infected with COVID-19, there were 18 cases (1%) of previous cancer, 3 of which were related to colorectal cancer [12,13].

Patients with COVID-19 and cancer had a higher risk of severe events because the expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme receptor 2 (ACE2) is higher in the colon epithelial cells of patients with adenoma or colorectal cancer. Such an association predisposes a higher risk of infection by COVID-19 (12,14).

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a worse risk of developing a severe infection or disease course since they have continued involvement and use corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agentes [15,16].

Pathophysiological changes

The human coronavirus has transmissibility and pathogenicity associated with recognition and binding to receptors. Protease cleavage and membrane fusion are resembling about 73% with SARS-CoV-1 [14-16]. 

One of the receptors involved in this process is related to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is expressed in pulmonary type 2 macrophages, as well as in squamous esophageal cells and ileum and colon enterocytes [13].

Therefore, several pathological findings of the gastrointestinal system were observed in patients with COVID-19. Intestinal segmental dilation or stenosis, degeneration, necrosis, and edema of the gastrointestinal mucosa in histology [1,6].

Despite this, Tian et al. did not report epithelial destruction of the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, and colorectal mucosa through hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Histology only indicated lymphocytic infiltration in the esophageal squamous epithelium, in addition to abundant plasma cells and lymphocytes infiltrated with interstitial edema in the stomach, duodenum and lamina propria of the rectum [1].

By observing the ACE2 cell receptor and viral nucleocapsid protein in tissue samples, it was shown that the positive areas were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells and the cilia of the gastrointestinal glandular epithelial cells [9-11]. 

Such changes were not found in the esophageal squamous epithelial cells. Similar receptors were observed in the stomach, duodenum, and rectal epithelial cells, suggesting that ACE2 receptors facilitate the entry of the virus into the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) [1,17].

The SARS-CoV-2 use ACE2 as a receptor on the host does it more efficiently than the strain identified in SARS-CoV-1 in 2003 [7]. However, even though the ACE2 receptor is found in TGI cells, more abundantly in patients positive for COVID-19 [7-9]. 

It cannot be concluded with certainty whether such an enzyme is decisive for the entry of the virus into the cell, and consequently is responsible for pathogenesis since higher levels of this enzyme were also found in the kidney of affected patients. Only a small portion of them was found viral RNA in the urine [17,18].

It is suggested that the virus can bind to cholangiocytes via the ACE2 receptor. This was confirmed by the presence of microvesicular steatosis and mild lobular activity in liver biopsy in the post-death of a patient with COVID-19. These changes suggest direct involvement by the virus or liver damage caused by drugs. However, no viral inclusion was seen in the liver [19].

Besides, there was the presence of mild to moderate liver damage associated with increased aminotransferases, hypoproteinemia and prolonged prothrombin time. It is worth noting that 60% of patients affected with SARS are suffering from liver failure, so care should be taken about these disorders in patients with COVID-19 [19-21].

SARS-associated hepatotoxicity is due to viral hepatitis or a side effect associated with the toxicity of antiviral drugs used in high doses. Despite the similarity between the two viruses, little is known about liver involvement in SARS-CoV-2 infection, but there is evidence of different degrees of liver dysfunction [12,13].

TGI manifestations, in general, can occur through three main mechanisms. The first occurs through the direct attack of the virus through a chain of inflammatory responses, which increases the permeability of the TGI wall and hinders absorption by enterocytes, culminating in diarrhea. It is corroborated by the detection of viral nucleocapsid protein in epithelial cells [15-17]. 

The second occurs through the use of antiviral drugs used to treat these patients since they induce nausea and diarrhea. The third occurs due to changes in the intestinal microbiota caused by the use of antibiotics, precipitating digestive symptoms by an indirect mechanism [1,13].

Syndromic aspects

The set of signs and symptoms caused by COVID-19 ranges from mild respiratory tract infection to severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and multiple organ dysfunction. Fever associated with respiratory symptoms is more common, and the scientific community is still discovering extrapulmonary manifestations [12].

According to a cross-sectional study that included 204 patients with COVID-19 admitted to 3 hospitals in Hubei province, 99 patients (43.5%) had symptoms of GIT as the chief complaint, and 7 of these patients did not have any respiratory symptoms [12].

Thus, despite being non-specific symptoms of the disease, retrospective studies have already proved that intestinal involvement occurs in a real way. Tian et al. highlighted anorexia as the most common gastrointestinal symptom, followed by diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, and abdominal pain. Anorexia results from the inflammatory process, hypoxia, damage to liver function, depression, or side effects of medications [1,12].

Corroborating this finding, Musa and Wong et al. found that 48.5% of the patients had gastrointestinal symptoms, 20% of whom had diarrhea, vomiting, or abdominal pain. Although diarrhea is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal symptoms, the presence of constipation has been proven. It was seen that mild symptoms usually last 3.7 days on average, and most have a self-limiting evolution. (1,12,19)

Zhang et al. studying the clinical characteristics of 140 patients in Wuhan, he found that more than a third of them had abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and anorexia [18,20].

Even after the improvement in the initial clinical picture, COVID-19-induced diarrhea persisted. The intestinal damage by the coronavirus promotes malabsorption in other symptoms of the disease [18].

Patients without digestive symptoms are more likely to be cured and discharged when compared to those with enteric involvement. This phenomenon is due to the intense viral replication in the GIT, leading to more severe disease, or too late diagnosis, in cases where there is no associated respiratory impairment [12].

Given the above, it is necessary to pay attention to cases that present only with manifestations of TGI. Cheung KS et al. demonstrated in a meta-analysis that part of the patients did not report respiratory symptoms or fever, but presented gastrointestinal symptoms, including anorexia, in 66.7% of the cases [17].

Studies corroborate the fact that critically ill patients are more likely to manifest digestive changes. It is believed that the high rate of severe cases indicates a more significant amount of virus and infectivity. Abdominal pain was more present in patients admitted to the intensive care unit than in those stable. The exact reason for explaining this has not yet been elucidated, but it should be discovered in future clinical trials with more sound samples (1,17).

Henry BM et al. observed that abdominal pain is associated with four times higher risk of developing critical illness in patients with nausea and vomiting; however, in contrast, there was no association with diarrhea [21].

It is worth noting that long-term hypoxemia and cell necrosis caused by Watery Respiratory Discomfort Syndrome (SRDA) causes damage to the gastrointestinal mucosa, ulceration, and bleeding. The use of corticosteroids, anti-inflammatories, and the metabolic response to stress affect the GIT mucosa. Therefore, analyzing whether gastrointestinal signs and symptoms are causes or consequences of the clinical condition is severe [1,8]

Other extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19 are the acute abdomen. A 53-year-old patient initially presented with symptoms of bloating, malaise, and fever. During the directed anamnesis, he referred to respiratory symptoms, such as a flu-like condition; but he denied dyspnea, arthralgia, and myalgia. During the evolution of the disease, the patient had distended abdominal loop suggestive of infectious colitis and a positive test for SARS-CoV-2. (6)

This case is essential to show the importance of directed anamnesis and the active search for patients with respiratory symptoms, even if at the time it appears to be a surgical or abdominal pathology. The prompt identification of these patients allows for isolation and immediate intervention. Therefore, we must investigate the presence of cough and fever independently. (4-6)

We don´t have a report of visceral perforation, mesenteric ischemia, or gastrointestinal bleeding in adults. However, there have been cases of hematochezia in children and neonates in critical condition. It is worth noting that rectal bleeding is not common in COVID-19, and should serve as a warning for other differential diagnoses [6,14,16].

Furthermore, in this moment of instability that society is experiencing, we should not underestimate the negative emotions that can simulate symptoms of IBD and irritable bowel syndrome [14].

A new fact presented by the researchers is the association of metabolic disorders with the dysfunction of the central nervous system and intestine axis. Some studies reveal that there are changes in the intestinal microbiota and an increase in the absorption of harmful metabolites due to the overexpression of enteric ACE2 receptors, which can cause dizziness, syncope, and fatigue [20-22]. 

In this regard, although gastrointestinal symptoms are less common in patients with COVID-19, the diagnosis cannot be excluded and should be investigated in all patients referred to the Emergency Department. A viable and fast alternative is the use of lung ultrasound at the bedside to detect signs of interstitial pneumonia, even in the absence of respiratory symptoms, as it helps in the early detection of other manifestations, in addition to those of GIT [11 -13].

Liver damage

The Liver damage may also be present in patients affected by COVID-19. The cytopathic effects induced by the virus cause direct hepatotoxicity. There is consistent evidence that SARS-CoV-2 binds directly to the cholangiocyte ACE2 receptor and disrupts liver function. Thus, gamma-glutamyltransferase% of the patients analyzed, while only 1.8% had a high level of alkaline phosphatase (AF) in recent trials [12,23].

Another explanation for this involvement is the high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in patients using mechanical ventilation, since it can increase hepatic congestion, due to the increase in right blood pressure and consequent difficulty in venous return [8-10]. It is important to note that drug-induced liver injury should be investigated. The most associated drugs are Lopinavir and Ritonavir, in addition to acetaminophen and antibiotics [12,23-25].

In patients with previous liver disease, the clinical course is more unfavorable, with the development of severe hepatitis due to increased viral replication during infection [11,12]. On the other hand, patients with hepatitis B and COVID-19 were observed in China, who did not have hepatic repercussions of greater severity, when compared to those without previous pathology [23].

Pediatric patients

In children, more cases of vomiting were observed when compared to adults, and up to 10% of children had only gastrointestinal symptoms, instead of respiratory symptoms at the beginning of the disease. The hypothesis formulated is that children should be more prone to gastrointestinal symptoms than respiratory symptoms. Another possibility is due to the immature immune system of children that can reduce the immune response in the respiratory system. However, no conclusions can be drawn, as there is a small number of cases in patients under 12 years of age [1-3].

Complementary exams

Due to the similar taxonomy of SARS-Cov-1 and MERS-CoV with SARS-CoV-2, it is common to associate their syndromic and laboratory aspects. Previous studies have shown that SARS-CoV RNA was detected in feces only from the fifth day of the disease. Besides, the proportion of fecal samples positive for viral RNA increased progressively, reaching maximum concentration on the eleventh day of infection and was present in the stool of a small portion of patients even after 30 days [7,17,24].

Tan Y. et al. observed in a retrospective study that even 15 days after the beginning of the clinical manifestations of COVID-19, viral particles of SARS-Cov-2 are still detected in fecal samples, contributing to the hypothesis that even after the elimination of the upper respiratory tract virus, it is still present in the gastrointestinal tract [25]. Not only were rectal swab and fecal samples positive, but viruses were also detected in saliva, urine, esophageal erosion, and bleeding from severe peptic ulcers [17,24].

In addition to the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts, the virus is in the blood of infected individuals. Therefore, a confirmed case is considered to be one with a compatible clinic associated with the presence of viral RNA in the blood or other culture medium. The presence of the virus alone in the feces has not yet been considered a standard for making the diagnosis of the disease [10,17,24-26].

For Chen et al., the presence of viral RNA in the feces did not correlate with the severity of respiratory symptoms and gastrointestinal manifestations [24].

Thus, the first step in investigating patients with suspected COVID-19 with only gastrointestinal manifestations is to look for other suggestive symptoms. The patient usually progresses with lymphocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in the nasopharyngeal swab, and presence of a ground-glass lesion on chest tomography. These tests are essential to differentiate the gastrointestinal symptoms of COVID-19 from other differential diagnoses [16].

As previously mentioned, research has shown liver changes of varying degrees. The elevation of liver enzyme levels with ALT ranged between 16% - 53%. Another study found an increase in total bilirubin, AST, and ALT in 10%, 21%, and 22% of patients, respectively. Changes in GGT and AF, too, may suggest liver involvement [18,23,27].

According to Wang et al., There was an increase in fecal calprotectin (CF) in those patients infected with COVID-19 who developed diarrheal conditions. Forty patients were evaluated, 55% of whom reported diarrhea. The concentration of CF was closely related to the serum concentration of interleukin-6, thus demonstrating a link with a critical intestinal inflammatory response [28].

The decision to discharge patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 should be based on the negative results of at least two samples of the respiratory tract collected within 24 hours, in addition to isolation for 14 days after the high [27,28].

Despite these recommendations, it is crucial to guide routine hand hygiene, cleaning bathrooms, and avoid sharing this environment with other family members. Because of what was previously seen concerning the presence of the virus in the feces, it has been suggested to add the RT-PCR analysis of fecal samples as part criteria hospital discharge [1,12,26].

Gastrointestinal Surgery

There is no denying the need for surgical treatment in most abdominal conditions. There are numerous therapeutic options, and the number of comorbidities that require surgical interventions is growing. However, in the face of this pandemic, all efforts should be aimed at reducing the risk of contamination in high-risk patients, including surgical ones. Thus, surgeons must make accurate diagnoses and need to weigh the risks and benefits involved in operative treatments [10,13].

Abdominal surgeries have a higher risk of perioperative respiratory complications. All respiratory dynamics are modified, either by the use of assisted ventilation (orotracheal intubation) or by the surgical procedure itself, which can lead to an increase in intra-abdominal pressure, postoperative pain, and cavity bleeding [7,10,21].

The laparoscopic technique involves artificial pneumoperitoneum, performed with the use of carbon dioxide (CO2). This process increases intra-abdominal pressure and retains pulmonary CO2 and reduces gas Exchange [8-10].

In the critical surgical patient, the release of inflammatory cytokines is a risk factor for severe COVID-19 infection. Therefore, all efforts to avoid unnecessary surgeries and, especially, outside the context of urgency and emergency, must be instituted by the team surgeon to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with COVID infection 19 as well as the contamination of the surgical team, in cases of infected but asymptomatic patients undergoing elective surgery [10,24-26].

However, inevitably, during the pandemic, there will be situations in which urgent surgery will be necessary. During the SARS outbreak, the transmission of infection from the donor to the recipient was reported during liver transplant surgery. Therefore, all precautions should be taken to reduce the risks of disease transmission [13].

Immune suppression

Patients with gastrointestinal diseases, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), usually use infliximab, 5-aminosalicylic acid, thalidomide, among others. Given the immunosuppression that these drugs can cause, the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology temporarily canceled the use of these classes of drugs, to avoid worse affections by COVID-19 [11-13].

In patients with IBD, hospitals have launched new therapeutic strategies for their patients, as the number of IBD-contaminated individuals was growing, with cases being reported in France, Italy, Spain, and the USA [15,28]

People with IBD are susceptible to frequent and severe infections. To stop this contamination, risk assessment, stricter prevention measures, patient education, contact by phone or internet, containment of patients with the same pathology in specific rooms, and delivery of medicines to those who lived in places were adopted distant [4,12,15].

These strategies were essential and contributed to the end of confirmed cases in the hospital in China. Such results proved that mass education is vital, and the implementation of stricter measures for immunosuppressed patients is crucial (15, 19-21)

Despite the recommendation being the total suspension of immunosuppression in patients, An P. et al. believe that this action should be taken according to the location addressed and the incidence rate of COVID-19 in this region [15,17-19].

Endoscopy

Contagion prevention measures, mainly by health professionals, are valid and reduce the chance of infection for these workers as well as patients. It is known that there is a higher risk of contagion through droplets in contact with mucous membranes and conjunctivae. For this reason, several entities and specialty societies assist in this regard [21,26].

However, it is estimated that about 10% of healthcare professionals become infected with the virus. The use of personal protective equipment, correct risk stratification of patients and isolation of suspected cases are measures that can reduce the risk of contagion [3,9,22].

In the context of the pandemic we are experiencing, surgical procedures and more invasive exams should only be performed in cases of extreme urgency and need. In endoscopy units, there is a high risk of droplet inhalation, conjunctival contact, and contamination during the examination. Coughing, choking, and vomiting may occur during endoscopy, just as flatus and liquid stools containing pathogens may be present during colonoscopy [16,20-22].

For this reason, the number of invasive tests performed during the COVID-19 outbreak should be limited, is indicated only in cases of digestive bleeding, presence of foreign bodies in the GIT, acute cholangitis secondary to bile duct obstruction and in situations that represent a risk of death. However, before the exam is performed, it is necessary to assess the patient for the presence of fever, respiratory, and gastrointestinal symptoms, as well as the laboratory diagnosis through the swab [16, 28-30].

Through the clinical approach, RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 on nasopharyngeal swab and chest computed tomography; patients should be classified as low, moderate, and high risk of transmission. Thus, the risks and benefits related to each patient should be considered for the examination. It is worth mentioning that the slow performance of diagnostic colonoscopy can increase the risk of high-grade dysplasia and colorectal câncer [5-7,16].

The procedures must be carried out in an isolated room with negative pressure; however, when this is not possible, ventilation must be adequate. Endoscopic accessories must be sterilized appropriately or use disposable accessories. Besides, professionals must be dressed in personal protective equipment (PPE), goggles, hat, mask, along with resistant clothing and gloves [10,29].

For Tao et al., the products used for disinfection are ether, 75% alcohol, fatty solvents, temperatures above 56oC, disinfectants with chlorine in their composition, and peroxyacetic and chloroform acids. Also, ultraviolet radiation and ozone must be used in endoscopy units to clean and sterilize the environment [10,21,26].

If they are not available, it is necessary to open the windows of the endoscopy room and wait for about an hour between procedures. All these measures must be taken carefully, since it has been proven, through an environmental study, that SARS-CoV-2 can remain viable in aerosols and stable in plastic and stainless steel for more than 72h [10,16,19, 30].

Conclusion

The pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has become a public health problem, in addition to generating a social and economic crisis in several countries around the world. Several studies are underway to clarify the clinical manifestations caused by the infection and to clarify the forms of transmission.

However, it is known that, in addition to respiratory symptoms, patients can start COVID-19 with the impaired gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, suspicion of COVID-19 should be raised, especially in high-risk patients, when there are digestive symptoms, even in the absence of respiratory symptoms. It is essential for health professionals to be aware of the extrapulmonary involvement of the disease, as they will help in the early identification of COVID-19.

All information about these atypical manifestations can have a significant impact on inhibiting transmission, especially in hospitalized patients, as well as on early treatment and better prognosis. Also, it was observed that the disease could be transmitted via the fecal-oral route, and therefore health measures must be taken effectively.

Depending on the World Health Organization (WHO), we believe that early suspicion and diagnosis are essential to contain the global spread of COVID-19 infection and preventive measures are crucial to stop the spread of the virus and prevent devastating outbreaks of the disease.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Ph.D. in Health Sciences and Teaching and Research Manager at League Against Cancer, Profa. Dra. Amália Rêgo, for her contribution and relevance to the scientific discussion and supervision of this research, acting as an expert consultant on the bibliographic survey, analysis, and scientific advice. We also thank all the study components for their dedication and effort to build a scientifically validated quality study.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare by any of the authors of this study.

References

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

img

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

img

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

img

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

img

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

img

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

img

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

img

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

img

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

img

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

img

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

img

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

img

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

img

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

img

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

img

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

img

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

img

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

img

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

img

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

img

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

img

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

img

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

img

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

img

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

img

George Varvatsoulias

Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.

img

Rui Tao

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.

img

Khurram Arshad